Legal Opinion
Pickford v. Borland
Washington Supreme Court
Decided November 3, 1913No. 11460PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Card, J., entered May 28, 1913, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on contract, tried to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtEllis, J.
The plaintiff seeks, in this action, to recover a balance claimed to be due upon the purchase price of certain personal property, conveyed to the defendant William Borland by a conditional contract of sale, and to have the lien reserved in the sale contract extended to certain notes not mentioned therein, nor executed by William Borland. The conditional contract of sale, so far as material to the questions here presented, was as follows:
*341“This indenture, Made this 2nd day of January, 1913, by and between Chas. Pickford, party of the first part, and William Borland, party of the second part,
“Wit…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- Davis v. BartzWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- Prince v. PrinceWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- City of Puyallup v. LakinWashington Supreme Court · 1907
- Ingham v. Harper & SonWashington Supreme Court · 1912
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wright v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Hill Syrup Co. v. Marine National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1924
- Stephenson v. Kenworthy Grain & Milling Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1936