Legal Opinion

Irwin v. Pacific Fruit & Produce Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1936No. 26180. En BancPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.

Plaintiff instituted this action for the purpose of recovering a balance which he alleged was due him, based upon the delivery by plaintiff to defendant of a quantity of potatoes grown by plaintiff during the year 1933. Plaintiff contended that he sold to defendant something over 500,000 pounds of potatoes at fifteen dollars per ton, for which he should have been paid by defendant $3,924.37, of which sum he admitted that he had received $3,400, leaving an unpaid balance of $524.37, for which he demanded judgment.

The defendant answered, denying any liability to plaintiff and affirmatively…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Sturm v. BokerSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Ludvigh v. American Woolen Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. In re Columbus Buggy Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
  4. In re GaltCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1903
  5. General Electric Co. v. BrowerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1915

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Paullus v. FowlerWashington Supreme Court · 1961
  2. In Re Taxes, Aiea Dairy, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Foelkner v. PerkinsWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Rathke v. Yakima Valley Grape Growers Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Charles Hulme v. Sweetman Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API