Legal Opinion

Foss v. Golden Rule Bakery

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 1935No. 25789. Department TwoPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

Respondent, a dealer in dairy apparatus and supplies, contracted to sell to appellant a combination milk bottle and can washing machine for $1,100. The machine was to be manufactured by respondent to the order of appellant. A sample bottle washing machine was inspected by an agent of appel lant at the plant of another dairy concern, which would wash bottles only. The machine required by appellant and ordered was to be a combination machine that would wash both milk bottles and cans, designed differently and made specially.

Appellant made a first payment of two hundred dollars under the sales…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Larson v. Farmers Warehouse Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Clise Investment Co. v. StoneWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Mikusch v. BeemanWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Vandiver v. B. B. Wilson CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  5. Progress Amusement Co. v. BakerWashington Supreme Court · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Dwelley v. ChesterfieldWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Fischler v. NicklinWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Felton v. Menan Starch Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1965
  4. State Bank of Wilbur v. PhillipsWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Dopps v. AldermanWashington Supreme Court · 1942

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API