Legal Opinion
Evans v. Plan & Zoning Commission
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided November 19, 2002No. AC 22203PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAVERY, C. J.
The plaintiffs, Dana Evans and David Evans, appeal from the judgment of the trial court dismissing their appeal from the decision of the defendant plan and zoning commission of the town of Glastonbury (commission). The commission had approved the applications of the defendant Testa Development Associates, *649LLC (Testa), for subdivision approval and a rear lot special permit.1 On appeal, the plaintiffs claim, as they did before the trial court, that the defendants failed to comply with applicable regulations and General Statutes § 22a-19. We conclude that the court properly…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Quarry Knoll II Corp. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Dragan v. Connecticut Medical Examining BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Paige v. Town Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Heithaus v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Doyen v. Zoning Board of Appeals of EssexConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- 200 Associates, LLC v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Collins Group, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Appeals of New HavenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Albini v. Connecticut Medical Examining BoardConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Animal Rights Front v. Glastonbury Pzc, No. Cv 01-0806758 (Nov. 15, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002
- Cohen v. Dept. of Energy & Environmental ProtectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.