Legal Opinion

National Labor Relations Board v. McEver Engineering, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 10, 1986No. 85-4603PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

E. GRADY JOLLY, Circuit Judge:

This case is before the court upon application of the National Labor Relations Board (the “Board”), pursuant to section 10(e) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 160(e) (the “Act”) for enforcement of its unfair labor practice order against McEver Engineering, Inc. (“McEver”). The Board found 1 that McEver had violated section 8(a)(1) of the Act, 29 U.S.C. § 158(a)(1), by firing seven employees who, faced with unusually hazardous working conditions, had concertedly engaged in a work stoppage. The Board also found that one of the seven employees,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Woelke & Romero Framing, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Washington Aluminum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Kenneth P. Prill v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
  5. National Labor Relations Board v. Columbia UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. McCullough Environmental Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  2. Sears, Roebuck & Company, Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-PetitionerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  3. Poly-America, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
  4. National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner-Cross-Respondent v. Dickerson-Chapman, Inc., Respondent-Cross-PetitionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  5. Monotech of Mississippi, Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-PetitionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API