Legal Opinion
State v. Poole
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 23, 1993No. C3-91-1963PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COYNE, Justice.
■ In its decision in this case, the court of appeals affirmed the convictions of defendant, Dr. James Robinson Poole, M.D., for violating subdivision l(k) of Minn.Stat. §§ 609.344 and 609.3451 but reduced defendant’s aggregate sentence from 18 years (six consecutive terms) to 12 years (three consecutive terms). State v. Poole, 489 N.W.2d 537 (Minn.App.1992). We granted separate petitions for review filed by defendant and the state. Concluding that defendant received a fair trial and was properly convicted of the offenses in question and that the court of appeals did not err in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. HannukselaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- State v. FilippiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- State v. NorrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- O'CONNOR v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- State v. FrisingerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- James Robinson Poole v. Kevin Goodno, 1 Commissioner, Minnesota Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- State of Minnesota v. Debra Lee FawcettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- James Robinson Poole v. Frank W. WoodCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- State of Minnesota v. Angel Ignacio Sardina-PadillaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2024
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.