Legal Opinion

State of Minnesota v. Debra Lee Fawcett

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 24, 2016No. A15-938PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GILDEA, Chief Justice.

The State charged appellant Debra Fawcett with criminal vehicular operation, Minn.Stat. § 609.21, subd. 1(2) (2012).1 Fawcett moved to suppress “all evidence of the presence of drugs” found in her blood, arguing that the warrant application and supporting affidavit failed to provide a lawful basis to test her blood for controlled substances. The district court granted Fawcett’s suppression motion. The State filed a pretrial appeal challenging the district court’s suppression order. The court of appeals reversed. Because we conclude that the warrant application and…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Groh v. RamirezSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Birchfield v. N. Dakota. William Robert BernardSupreme Court of the United States · 2016

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State of Minnesota v. Kristi Dannette McneillySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2024
  2. State of Minnesota v. Angel Ignacio Sardina-PadillaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2024
  3. State of Minnesota v. Adam Blaine DavisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
  4. State of Minnesota v. Anthony Richard SmebyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
  5. State of Minnesota v. Ivan Contreras-SanchezCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API