State of Minnesota v. Debra Lee Fawcett
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GILDEA, Chief Justice.
The State charged appellant Debra Fawcett with criminal vehicular operation, Minn.Stat. § 609.21, subd. 1(2) (2012).1 Fawcett moved to suppress “all evidence of the presence of drugs” found in her blood, arguing that the warrant application and supporting affidavit failed to provide a lawful basis to test her blood for controlled substances. The district court granted Fawcett’s suppression motion. The State filed a pretrial appeal challenging the district court’s suppression order. The court of appeals reversed. Because we conclude that the warrant application and…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Groh v. RamirezSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Birchfield v. N. Dakota. William Robert BernardSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State of Minnesota v. Kristi Dannette McneillySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Angel Ignacio Sardina-PadillaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Adam Blaine DavisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- State of Minnesota v. Anthony Richard SmebyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Ivan Contreras-SanchezCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.