Legal Opinion

Bigham v. . Foor

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 20, 1931PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

Upon the facts found by the trial court, which are conclusive on appeal, as they are supported by competent evidence (Hennis v. Hennis, 180 N. C., 606, 105 S. E., 274), there was no error in holding that the defendant was a nonresident of the State within the meaning of chapter 75, Public Laws 1929, at the time of the collision between her automobile and the truck driven by the plaintiff. Brann v. Hanes, 194 N. C., 571, 140 S. E., 292; Gower v. Carter, 195 N. C., 697, 143 S. E., 513; S. v. Carter, 194 N. C., 293, 139 S. E., 604; Roanoke Rapids v. Patterson, 184 N. C., 135, 113 S. E., 603;…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ashley v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. State Ex Rel. Hannon v. GrizzardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  3. Town of Roanoke Rapids v. PattersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  4. Osborn v. . LeachSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  5. State v. Munn.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Sherwood v. SherwoodCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Briggs v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  3. Ewing v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. Dowling v. . WintersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  5. Suit v. ShailerDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1937

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API