Mote v. White Lake Lumber Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBeosjdeN, J.
Deeds for standing timber convey a fee-simple interest in such timber, determinable as to all such timber as is not cut and removed within the time specified in the contract. Austin v. Brown, 191 N. C., 624.
In Timber Co. v. Wells, 171 N. C., 262, Justice Hoke, in discussing the nature and effect of extension clauses in timber deeds, says: “The cases on the subject are to the effect, further, that a stipulation of the kind now presented, providing for an extension of the time within which the timber must be cut, is in the nature of an option, and it is held by the great weight of authority…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Boddie v. BondSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Manufacturing Co. v. . Building Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Carolina Timber Co. v. WellsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- Austin v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- Hyder v. Board of County Road Trustees for Henderson CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bigham v. . FoorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Wells v. . CrumplerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- State v. ElderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2022
- State v. ElderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2022