Legal Opinion

Blakely v. SAIF Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 24, 1988No. WCB 84-02190; CA A40273PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.

Claimant seeks review of a Workers’ Compensation Board order affirming the referee and holding that claimant failed to prove that her bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome was compensable. On de novo review, we affirm.

Between 1974 and 1980, claimant worked as a custodian for the Medford School District (District). Her duties included wiping walls and windows, waxing floors and doing various other cleaning activities.1 In 1980, she was promoted to head custodian, a position which required maintenance work, but less cleaning. In September, 1981, she sustained a compensable injury to her lower back.2…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Weller v. Union Carbide Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Dethlefs v. Hyster Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Moe v. Ceiling Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  4. Clark v. Erdman Meat PackingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Liberty Northwest Insurance v. CrossCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  2. Mal v. Unique Building Maintenance Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API