Fischer v. North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SANDSTROM, Justice.
Ricky Fischer appeals a Workers Compensation Bureau order denying him benefits based on a significant change in medical condition since benefits were last changed. We reverse. The bureau’s unreopened earlier order is res judicata as to the claimant’s medical condition at that time. To deny benefits because of no significant change in condition, the bureau wrongly held the claimant’s condition was actually worse than it found in its earlier order.
I
In 1990, the bureau awarded rehabilitation benefits relating to Fischer’s 1989 work-re lated injury. Although there was some…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Thompson v. North Dakota Workers' Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Lass v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Lamplighter Lounge v. State Ex Rel. HeitkampNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Americana Healthcare Center v. North Dakota Department of Human ServicesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
3Cited by13 opinions
- Cridland v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Saakian v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Held v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- Otto v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- Drayton v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.