Legal Opinion

Held v. North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1995No. Civ. 950158PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEUMANN, Justice.

Edwin Held appeals from a district court judgment which affirmed a Workers Compensation Bureau decision awarding him vocational rehabilitation benefits. We affirm.

Held hurt his back in June 1990 while employed as an auto service technician at O.K. Tire Store in Bismarck. The Bureau accepted Held’s claim and paid medical and disability benefits. Held returned to work but reinjured his back in October 1992. He was unable to return to his prior job. His treating physician recommended vocational rehabilitation services.

A vocational consultant recommended, as the first appropriate…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Thompson v. North Dakota Workers' Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  2. City of Fargo v. StutlienNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Smith v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Schiff v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Fischer v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Vetter v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Sonsthagen v. SprynczynatykNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Paul v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Lucier v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Bjerklie v. WORKFORCE SAFETY AND INSURANCENorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API