Americana Healthcare Center v. North Dakota Department of Human Services
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
LEVINE, Justice.
Americana Healthcare Center (Americana) appeals from a judgment of dismissal with prejudice. Because we conclude that Americana’s claim for relief against the North Dakota Department of Human Services (DHS) is barred by the doctrine of res judicata, we affirm.
Americana is a long-term care provider which receives reimbursement for care of some of its residents under the Medicaid program. DHS administers the Medicaid program by determining a per diem rate for care of eligible residents and reimbursing the long-term care provider accordingly. DHS applies its ratesetting methods…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hofsommer v. Hofsommer Excavating, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- R.R. Donnelley & Sons Company v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Peacock v. Sundre TownshipNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- K & K Implement v. First Nat. Bank, Hettinger, North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- True v. HeitkampNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cridland v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- McCarty v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Fischer v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- Ziesch v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Chapman v. WellsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.