Legal Opinion

Carson v. Crossman

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 29, 1924No. 11854PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

JONES, C.

This action was originally instituted in the district court of Tulsa county, on the 25th day of April, 1919. by the plaintiff in error, as plaintiff, against defendant in error, as defendant, for a dissolution and an accounting of th<> properly and profits derived from a certain copart-nership relation existing between the said plaintiff in error and defendant in error, same being a partnership formed for the purpose of buying and selling real estate.

The petition sets forth the contract, the basis of the original partnership agreement, and alleges that same still exists,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cobb v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Dill v. FlesherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. Wey v. City Bank of HobartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  4. Shultz v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
  5. Weber v. ZachariasAppellate Court of Illinois · 1903

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wright v. SaltmarshSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Carson v. Exchange Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  3. Wilson Co. v. RussellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API