Wey v. City Bank of Hobart
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from Kiowa County Court; J. W. Mansell, Judge. Action by PI. C. Wey and others against the City Bank of I-Iobart and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
This proceeding in error is to review the judgment of the lower court in an action in replevin. The petition described the chattels sued for as “two young mules.” It is not contended that in any other respect the allegations are insufficient. A general demurrer was interposed, which was overruled. A motion to make more definite and certain was then presented, which was also overruled. When the plaintiffs offered to introduce their evidence, objection was made thereto on the ground that the petition did not state a cause of action, which was sustained. The petition was good against the general…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Savings Bank of San Diego County v. BurnsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- City of Guthrie v. ShafferSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
- Pefley v. JohnsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
- Hays v. DennisWashington Supreme Court · 1895
- Farwell v. FoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Long v. ShepardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Landon v. MoreheadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Purcell v. CorderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Bohart v. MathewsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Wright v. SaltmarshSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.