Legal Opinion

Shultz v. Jones

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 27, 1895PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from- the District Court of Logan County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

BurfORD, J.:

The defendant in error, Alexander Jones, filed his petition in the district court of Logan county, in -which he alleged that he was a resident of Logan county, and Territory of Oklahoma, and a citizen of the United States, and that he did not enter the Territory of Oklahoma and the lands opened to settlement by the act of congress of March 22, 1889, and the president’s proclamation thereunder, prior to 12 o’clock noon, on the 22d day of April, 1889. That he was qualified and entitled to settle upon, occupy and acquire title to lots in the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Twine v. CareySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1894
  2. Maddox v. BurnhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1895

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wey v. City Bank of HobartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. Wright v. SaltmarshSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Schmeusser v. SchmeusserSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  4. Sarkeys v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
  5. Lawrence v. EstesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API