Legal Opinion

Qvale v. City of Willmar

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 27, 1946No. 34,245PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Magnet, Justice.

Appellant is the owner of platted lots in the city of Willmar, the defendant herein. The city had constructed a water main on and along the street fronting certain of these lots and made an assessment against them and other lots for the cost of the installation. Appellant, contesting the assessment, appealed to the district court. The court confirmed the assessment, and appellant appealed from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

Appellant’s lots lie between two streets. They have a frontage of 200 feet facing south on Litchfield avenue. These lots are 150 feet deep.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. State ex rel. Oliver Iron Mining Co. v. City of ElySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  3. State ex rel. Cunningham v. District Court of Ramsey CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
  4. In Re Assessment for Improving Superior StreetSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  5. State ex rel. Shannon v. Judges of District Court of Eleventh Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Village of Edina v. JosephSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  2. Quality Homes, Inc. v. Village of New BrightonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  3. Nebco, Inc. v. SpeedlinNebraska Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Anderson v. City of BemidjiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  5. Joint Independent School District No. 287 v. City of Brooklyn ParkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API