Legal Opinion

Nelson v. City of St. Paul

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 15, 1977No. 47062Published

1Per curiam

Gust and Alvina Nelson, in accordance with appropriate statutory provisions, challenged the validity of certain assessments levied by the city of St. Paul against their *640real property. The trial court determined that the amount of the assessment was in excess of the benefits to the property and that the improvements actually conferred no benefit on the property. The city of St. Paul appeals from the judgment. We affirm.

A detailed statement of the facts is unnecessary. We have reviewed the proceedings herein and hold that the trial court properly applied the standards we have established for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Carlson-Lang Realty Co. v. City of WindomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  2. Gibbish v. Village of BurnsvilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  3. Balbach v. MoeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API