Legal Opinion

Matter of Golden

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 19, 1998No. 24747PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

In this attorney grievance matter, the Respondent Harvey L. Golden (“Attorney”) is alleged to have committed misconduct by making gratuitously insulting, threatening, and demeaning comments in the course of two depositions. It is alleged that Attorney’s conduct violated Rules 4.4 and 8.4 of the Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 407, SCACR, and section 5 of the Rule of Disciplinary Procedure, former Rule 413, SCACR. Attorney denies any misconduct. He contends his actions during the depositions were reasonable and necessary to obtain responses from hostile witnesses. Attorney further asserts…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of DobsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  2. In the Matter of GoudeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. StatzerOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. LinkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  3. State v. KennerlySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  4. In Re Anonymous Member of the South Carolina BarSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  5. Brandt Ex Rel. Estate of Brandt v. GoodingSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API