Legal Opinion

In Re Anonymous Member of the South Carolina Bar

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 20, 2001No. 25346PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

As the result of our consideration of an attorney disciplinary matter in which an attorney was charged with commission of misconduct based on alleged discovery abuse, for the benefit of the bar we take this opportunity to address a senior attorney’s duty to supervise junior attorneys and attorney conduct in depositions.

I. Rule 407, SCACR, Rule 5.1 1

A. Overview of Rule 5.1

Rule 5.1 2 governs the responsibilities of partners and lawyers who, directly or indirectly, supervise other lawyers. Attorneys in South Carolina do not have “vicarious liability” 3 for the ethical violations of other…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. In Re Alford Chevrolet-GeoTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Hall v. Clifton PrecisionDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Samples v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
  5. In Re BarrySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In re Virgin Islands Bar Ass'n CommitteeSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2013
  2. Barnette Ex Rel. Barnette v. Adams Bros. LoggingSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  3. Jamison v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
  4. In Re MyersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  5. Temple v. Tec-Fab, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API