Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Goude

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 14, 1988No. 22920PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent is charged with misconduct for his behavior during and immediately following a criminal trial. From a finding of attorney misconduct, the Executive Committee recommends that Respondent receive a public reprimand. We agree with both the finding of misconduct and the recommended sanction.

Respondent, part-time public defender for Georgetown County, was appointed to represent a minister charged with sexually molesting a teenage boy (victim), who testified on behalf of the State.

Despite the presentation of a vigorous defense at trial, the defendant was found guilty. Respondent,…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. KennerlySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  2. Matter of GoldenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  3. In Re Complaint as to Conduct of MeyerOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Brandt v. OzmintDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2009
  5. In Re Anonymous Member of the South Carolina BarSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API