Legal Opinion

Piper v. Childs

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 1, 1935PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLummtjs, J.

These are two actions of tort for deceit. The defendants were officers and substantial stockholders of a corporation named Childs, Jeffries & Company, Inc., which was in business as a broker and investment banker. The plaintiff, in January, 1929, having been employed for about a year as sales manager for the corporation, bought thirty-six shares of its stock at $550 a share. The defendants represented to him that its liquidating value was $551.55 a share. He did not see the books, and the defendants by their conduct discouraged him from asking to see them. The judge, sitting without a jury,…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. United States v. California Coöperative CanneriesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Credits Commutation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. Cutter v. HamlenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  4. United Zinc Companies v. HarwoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  5. Fulton National Bank of Atlanta v. HozierSupreme Court of the United States · 1925

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Twin Fires Investment, LLC v. Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
  2. National Shawmut Bank v. JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  3. Rice v. PriceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960
  4. Graustein v. H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  5. Kraft Power Corp. v. MerrillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API