Legal Opinion

Kraft Power Corp. v. Merrill

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 14, 2013PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuffly, J.

This case requires us to decide whether certain claims premised on a theory of corporate disregard survive the death of John J. Marino, such that his estate may now be sued by the plaintiff, Kraft Power Corporation (Kraft).

Because the doctrine of corporate disregard is not a cause of action but an equitable doctrine by which an act or obligation of a corporation giving rise to a cause of action may be charged to a principal of the corporation, we look to the underlying claims to decide whether a cause of action survives.3 We conclude that Kraft’s claims for breach of contract; for remedies…

2Cases cited68 opinions

  1. United States v. BestfoodsSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Anthony's Pier Four, Inc. v. HBC ASSOCIATESMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  3. Morris v. New York State Department of Taxation & FinanceNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Peacock v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Slaney v. Westwood Auto, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Klairmont v. Gainsboro Restaurant, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
  2. Lipsitt v. PlaudMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
  3. McDermott v. Marcus, Errico, Emmer & Brooks, P.C.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
  4. Evans v. Lorillard Tobacco Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
  5. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API