Cutter v. Hamlen
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.
The first case is an action in two counts, the first of which alleges, in substance, that, to induce the plaintiff to hire a house, the defendant falsely represented that the drains, etc. were in perfect order, and that “ the house was sweet and healthy”; that the plaintiff was induced by these representations to hire, and did hire, the house; that the drains were in bad condition, and the house was unhealthy and infected with diphtheria, all of which the defendant knew; and that the plaintiff, by using the house, was made sick with ■ diphtheria, unable to pursue any business, and helpless…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. PierceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
- Bowe v. HunkingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
- Norton v. SewallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
- Cowen v. SunderlandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
- Minor v. SharonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- Kannavos v. AnninoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1969
- Bethlahmy v. BechtelIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
- United Zinc Companies v. HarwoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Piper v. ChildsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Hess v. LowreyIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.