Legal Opinion

C.J.M. Construction, Inc. v. Chandler Plumbing & Heating, Inc.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 9, 1985No. S-250PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOORE, Justice.

This case involves the effectiveness of an express indemnity clause in a construction contract. The trial court ruled that C.J.M. Construction Company, Inc. was contractually obligated to indemnify Chandler Plumbing & Heating, Inc. We affirm.

I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

In May 1975, Chandler entered into a contract with the University of Alaska to construct laboratory facilities, the O’Neill Building, on the Fairbanks campus. Chandler entered into a subcontract with C.J.M. In accordance with the subcontract, C.J.M. made concrete saw penetrations in the floors of the O’Neill…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jones v. Strom Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Manson-Osberg Company v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Stepanov v. GavrilovichAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Burgess Construction Co. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Stephan & Sons, Inc. v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Luedtke v. Nabors Alaska Drilling, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Hoffman Construction Co. of Alaska v. U.S. Fabrication & Erection, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Silvers v. SilversAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Usibelli Coal Mine, Inc. v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Criterion Insurance Co. v. VelthouseAlaska Supreme Court · 1988

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API