C.J.M. Construction, Inc. v. Chandler Plumbing & Heating, Inc.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MOORE, Justice.
This case involves the effectiveness of an express indemnity clause in a construction contract. The trial court ruled that C.J.M. Construction Company, Inc. was contractually obligated to indemnify Chandler Plumbing & Heating, Inc. We affirm.
I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
In May 1975, Chandler entered into a contract with the University of Alaska to construct laboratory facilities, the O’Neill Building, on the Fairbanks campus. Chandler entered into a subcontract with C.J.M. In accordance with the subcontract, C.J.M. made concrete saw penetrations in the floors of the O’Neill…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jones v. Strom Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1974
- Manson-Osberg Company v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
- Stepanov v. GavrilovichAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Burgess Construction Co. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
- Stephan & Sons, Inc. v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Luedtke v. Nabors Alaska Drilling, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1992
- Hoffman Construction Co. of Alaska v. U.S. Fabrication & Erection, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001
- Silvers v. SilversAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
- Usibelli Coal Mine, Inc. v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
- Criterion Insurance Co. v. VelthouseAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.