Legal Opinion

Robinson v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided December 28, 1949No. C. D. 1201PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ford, Judge:

The above protest brings before us for decision the question of the proper classification of certain imported suitcases or week-end bags which were classified by the collector as “articles in C. V. of yarns, threads & filaments, in part braid.” Duty was accordingly levied thereon at the rate of 90 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1529 (a) of the Tariff Act of 1930. In the original protest claim is made that the merchandise is properly dutiable under paragraph 1531 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the trade agreement with the United Kingdom, T. D. 49753 (74 Treas.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. Smith & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
  2. United States v. Post Fish Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  3. United States v. Snow's United States Sample Express Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  4. United States v. American Shipping Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  5. Andrews & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. John S. Connor, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  2. May Department Stores Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
  3. Maupin v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
  4. Platon Fabrics Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  5. Steinmetz Bros., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API