Legal Opinion

Meek v. Wheeler, Kelly & Hagny Investment Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 11, 1926No. 26,872PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.;

This action arose under the compensation law. Plaintiff was injured by falling from a scaffold while painting the *70interior of a business building in Wichita. The defendant, his employer, paid plaintiff $435 as compensation, at the rate of $15 per week for 29 weeks following his injury; after which period payments were stopped, on the assumed ground that plaintiff’s incapacity had ceased. ■ This action followed.

An advisory 'jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $1,700, together with certain special findings of fact:

“Speci…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stefan v. Red Star Mill & Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  2. Priest v. Kansas City Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  3. Emry ex rel. Emry v. CripesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
  4. Mitchell v. Derby Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  5. Anderson v. Commonwealth Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Koehn v. Central National InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  2. Schwab v. NordstromSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  3. Indemnity Ins. Co. of North America v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API