Stefan v. Red Star Mill & Elevator Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from Sedgwick district court, division No. 1; Richard E. Bird, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Burch, J.:
The action was one for compensation. The plaintiff recovered, and the defendant appeals.
The defendant complains because the plaintiff did not proceed by arbitration. The plaintiff was injured on August 25, 1917. On December 19, written demand for compensation was made. The Miller’s Mutual Casualty Company took charge of the matter for the defendant, through its secretary, Adderly, and its attorney, Holmes. Adderly promised to give the plain*370tiff’s attorney an answer respecting compensation, and never did so. A letter to Holmes dated January…
2Cited by33 opinions
- Georgia Casualty Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
- Sigley v. Marathon Razor Blade Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
- Rogers v. Board of Public UtilitiesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1944
- Emry ex rel. Emry v. CripesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
- Smith v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1924
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.