Legal Opinion

Schwab v. Nordstrom

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 9, 1933No. 31,181PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, J.:

This is an action for damages for assault and battery. Each of the defendants answered denying liability and by cross petition sought to recover similar damages from plaintiff. The jury answered special questions and returned'verdicts which were construed by the court as being against each of the parties seeking to recover. Plaintiff has appealed.

It appears from the record that plaintiff had a hay-baling outfit with which he went from farm to farm throughout the neighborhood baling hay at an agreed price per bale. The defendant John…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hall ex rel. Hall v. McClureSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  2. Litsch v. Kansas Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  3. Meek v. Wheeler, Kelly & Hagny Investment Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1926

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Gary D. Patton, Cross-Appellant v. Albert E. Guyer, Martha Frances Guyer, Howard Fisher, D/B/A Fisher's I.G.A., Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
  2. Sams v. Commercial Standard InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  3. Wayne B. Cheney v. Millard MolerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
  4. Association of Western Railways v. Riss & Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
  5. Neal v. WailesWyoming Supreme Court · 1959

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API