Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Commonwealth Oil & Refining Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 6, 1922No. 24,033PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Allen district court; Robert E. Cullison, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the couk was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

Tnis is an appeal in a compensation case in which verdict and judgment went in favor of the plaintiff.

Defendant complains of the amount awarded, insisting that the verdict and findings lave not sufficient support in the evidence. Plaintiff was a pumper at défendant’s oil plant and because of an alleged defect in the machinery his arm was caught therein and his body was carried around striking the ground at each revolution with the result that Ills arm was broken in six places, a number of ribs were broken and his body badly bruised. A…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stefan v. Red Star Mill & Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  2. Raffaghelle v. RussellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  3. Emry ex rel. Emry v. CripesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
  4. Close v. Lucky O. K. Mining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1919

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Riggan v. Coleman Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1948
  2. Rogers v. Board of Public UtilitiesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1944
  3. Smith v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  4. Wammack v. Root Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  5. Cody v. Lewis & West Transit MixSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API