Legal Opinion
Hegeman Farms Corp. v. Baldwin
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided November 5, 1934No. 27PublishedCited by 120 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cardozo
delivered the: opinion of the Court.
In this suit for an injunction, the appellant, a wholesale milk dealer, contests the validity under the Fourteenth Amendment of orders of the New York Milk Control Board limiting the price of milk. A District Court of three judges, organized in accordance with § 266 of the Judicial Code (28 U. S. C. § 380), has denied a motion by the complainant for an interlocutory injunction, and granted a motion by the defendants to- dismiss the bill. 6 F. Supp. 297. No testimony was taken, but for the purposes of the two motions certain facts were stipulated and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Aetna Insurance v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- P. F. Petersen Baking Co. v. BryanSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Public Service Commission v. Great Northern Utilities Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Hegeman Farms Corporation v. BaldwinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1934
3Cited by120 opinions
- Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Baldwin v. G. A. F. Seelig, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Morey v. DoudSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc. v. Du MondSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
115 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.