Legal Opinion
Barber v. . Minges
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided June 2, 1943PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1ConcurrenceStacy, C. J.
DENNY, J., joins in concurring opinion.
2Concurring in part, dissenting in partWinborne, J.
The plaintiff administratrix brought this action to recover damages for the injury and death of her intestate, Guy A. Barber; which she alleges was caused by the negligence of defendants.
The defendants were engaged in bottling and distributing soft drinks, with an office or plant at Salisbury, and Barber was employed by them in that business. Pursuant to a custom of providing an annual outing for employees and their families in the promotion of good will, the defendants, through an agent, Sloop, organized and conducted a fishing trip to South Carolina,…
3Cases cited26 opinions
- Conrad v. Cook-Lewis Foundry Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Mackin v. Detroit-Timkin Axle Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Kennerson v. Thames Towboat Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
- Stakonis v. United Advertising CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Klawinski v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by23 opinions
- Morrison v. Burlington IndustriesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Hyler v. GTE Products Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
- Parsons v. Pantry, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
- Hogan v. Cone Mills Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- Wooten v. RodenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.