Herholtz Et Vir v. West Penn Rys. Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Me. Justice Allen M. Steaene,
These are appeals in an action in trespass by a husband and wife, plaintiffs, against a street car corporation, defendant, from the refusal to take off a compulsory nonsuit entered against them. The negligence charged was in defendant’s operation of its street car in starting the car with an extraordinarily violent jar or jolt from the car’s standing position and injuring the wife plaintiff who was a passenger.
Considering the testimony in the light most favorable to plaintiffs, the facts are as follows:
Catherine Herholtz, with her husband, boarded a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Smith Et Ux. v. Pittsburghi Rys. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Staller v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Hill v. West Penn Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Hufnagel v. Pittsburgh Rwys. Co., Etc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Zieger v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Kaufman v. Baltimore Transit Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Wiggins v. Capital Transit CompanyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956
- Shamblee v. Virginia Transit Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1963
- Meussner v. Port Authority of Allegheny CountyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Schilling v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.