Van Nostern v. Richey & Gilbert Co.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGeraghty, J.
As the issues of law and fact in the two cases involved on this appeal were substantially the same, they were consolidated for trial in the court below. In each case, recovery was sought from the two corporate defendants for loss sustained by the plaintiff as the result of the negligent management of a warehouse in which he had stored a quantity of onions.
The plaintiff Puyear, in the summer of 1936, grew and harvested a crop of onions on land owned by the plaintiff Van Nostem, on a crop-sharing arrangement, by the terms of which Van Nostem was to receive one-third of the crop as rental. The…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Patterson v. Wenatchee Canning Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
- Alexander v. Al G. Barnes Amusement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
- Poole's Seed & Implement Co. v. RudeneWashington Supreme Court · 1921
- Church Manufacturing Co. v. American Security BankWashington Supreme Court · 1924
- Downie v. SavageWashington Supreme Court · 1913
3Cited by7 opinions
- Estep v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- Lopeman v. GeeWashington Supreme Court · 1952
- Brace v. Salem Cold Storage, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1961
- Most Worshipful Prince Hall Grand Lodge v. Most Worshipful Universal Grand LodgeWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- State Ex Rel. Fosburgh v. RonaldWashington Supreme Court · 1946
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.