Legal Opinion

Platts v. Arney

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1955No. 32850PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

This appeal presents two questions: (1) Does the contract, upon which plaintiff sues for damages for an alleged breach, fail to meet the requirements of the statute of frauds; and (2) is the expense of a pretrial deposition of a witness (not a party to the action), taken for the purpose of discovery, taxable as costs, when the deposition is only used at trial in the cross-examination of the witness?

We will refer to Willard G. Platts and W. G. Platts, Inc., a Washington corporation, as plaintiff; and to C. F. Arney and Betty E. Arney, his wife, as defendant.

June 21, 1952, plaintiff and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hubbell v. WardWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Westland Construction Co. v. Chris Berg, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Grant v. AuvilWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Bergstrom v. OlsonWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Keys v. KlittenWashington Supreme Court · 1944

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Galowich v. Beech Aircraft Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Bohman v. BergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Moe v. WiseCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
  4. Platts v. ArneyWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Tenco, Inc. v. ManningWashington Supreme Court · 1962

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API