Goldman v. Sotelo
Arizona Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the Third Judicial District in and for the County of Maricopa. Webster Street, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.
The plaintiff, Pedro Sotelo, brought suit in the court below against Charles Goldman, as administrator of the estate of M. "Wormser, deceased, to recover for labor and services, under the terms of an express contract alleged to have been made by him with the said Wormser in his lifetime. The cause was tried before a jury, and a verdict rendered in the plaintiff’s favor for the sum of $973, upon which the court entered judgment. The administrator appeals from the judgment and from the order overruling his motion for a new trial.
It is first complained of, as error, that the trial court…
2Cited by18 opinions
- Langston v. CurrieMontana Supreme Court · 1933
- Stewart v. SchnepfArizona Supreme Court · 1945
- Cox v. WilliamsonMontana Supreme Court · 1951
- Costello v. GleesonArizona Supreme Court · 1914
- Steinfeld v. MartenyArizona Supreme Court · 1932
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.