Gordon v. Booker
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Haynes, C.
This action is brought by plaintiff to quiet title to certain lots in the Central Addition to the city of Fresno. The defendant had judgment, and the plaintiff appeals from the judgment, and an order denying his motion for a new trial.
The half-section line running east and west through section 4 is the north boundary line of the city of Fresno. Plaintiff’s lots lie on the north side of this line, and defendant’s on the south side.
The point in controversy is the location of this half-section line, and, upon the trial, that point turned upon the location of the half-section corner on…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Chandler v. HibberdCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Bloxham v. SaldingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Verdi Development Co. v. Dono-Han Mining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1956
- Howard v. CunninghamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
- O'Hara v. O'BrienCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.