O'Hara v. O'Brien
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Contra Costa County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Vanclief, C.
Action to recover possession of the northeast quarter of section number 1 of township number 1 north, range 2 east, Mt. Diablo base and meridian, situate in Contra Costa county.
The complaint being in the ordinary form and unverified, the answer denies generally each and every allegation thereof; and then specially alleges adverse possession of the demanded premises by the defendants during a period of more than five years before the commencement of the action, and that the action is barred by the statute of limitations.
The cause was tried by a jury, which returned a general…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Chapman v. PolackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Gordon v. BookerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Blackburn v. NelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Wise v. BurtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
3Cited by3 opinions
- Chandler v. HibberdCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Ferguson v. Basin Consolidated MinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Godley v. HinelySupreme Court of Georgia · 1928