Legal Opinion

Steiner v. Eikerling

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 28, 1986No. A018927PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

POCHE, J.

The primary focus of this appeal is whether any cause of action can be stated against those who knowingly prepare and offer a forged will for probate.

I

Plaintiffs and appellants are the heirs of Franz Benno Steiner, deceased, and the administrators of his estate (appellants or American relatives); defendants and respondents are the beneficiaries and executor under the purported will (respondents or German relatives).

On April 1, 1976, the testator, a resident of Marin County, California, died while on vacation in West Germany. Keeping his death secret, the German relatives came…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Bertero v. National General Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Ribas v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Pettitt v. LevyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  5. Barbary Coast Furniture Co. v. SjolieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Silberg v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Flatley v. MauroCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Rusheen v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Kimmel v. GolandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Edwards v. Centex Real Estate Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1997

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API