Legal Opinion

Estate of Truckenmiller

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 27, 1979No. Civ. 54712PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ROTHMAN, J. *

The administrator of an estate sought to set aside an inter vivos gift which decedent (Truckenmiller) allegedly gave as the result of the undue influence of the gift’s recipients (Mr. and Mrs. Wells). Judgment was rendered for the recipients and against the administrator.^ The administrator appeals, contending that the trial judge erred in refusing to admit testimony at the trial to the effect that decedent told two people before he died that he had been “tricked” into the gift by the recipients.

The Facts

In 1972, Kenneth R. Truckenmiller was a 68-year-old widower in poor…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Shailer v. BumsteadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  2. Hansen v. Bear Film Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
  3. People v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Jenkins v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Whitlow v. DurstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re Conservatorship of Estate of DavidsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  2. People v. DeeneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  3. Estate of SarabiaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  4. Estate of ClementiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. Chimenti v. WeiszCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API