Legal Opinion

Lazarus, Rosenfeld & Lehmann v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 1, 1912No. 624PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 7174 (T. D. 31331).

1Opinion of the CourtDe Vries, Judge

This controversy' concerns merchandise aptly described in the opinion of the Board of General Appraisers as alabaster pedestals about 3 feet high, each consisting of a base, column, and capital. Some of the pedestals are plain in their construction, some are in the form of smooth spiral columns with plain capitals and bas^s, and others are fluted columns more or less elaborately decorated with conventional designs, but having plain capitals and bases.

The importation of this merchandise presented for decision the question whether or notitwas properly dutiable as "alabaster * * * manufactured…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. United States v. OlivottiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  2. Frei Art Glass Co. v. UnitedCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  3. United States v. DowningCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  4. Petry Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923
  5. Stern v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API