Legal Opinion

Van Antwerp v. Smith

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 11, 1940No. Civ. 11061PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWard, J.

An appeal by defendant in a personal injury action from an order granting plaintiff’s motion for a new trial. The order was granted upon the grounds of the insufficiency of the evidence to justify the verdict, and that the verdict is against the law. Appellant contends that the evidence as a matter of law establishes his freedom from negligence, and that contributory negligence of plaintiff was conclusively shown.

Appellant attacks certain instructions given the jury on the court’s own motion. It is admitted, however, that no prejudice resulted to his cause as a result thereof as the jury…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Zibbell v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Wright v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Wright v. ForemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  4. Lavin v. FereiraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  5. Gibb v. CleaveCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Moore v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. Dickison v. LaThorpeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Hyams v. SimoncelliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  4. Talley Transfer Co. v. ConesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
  5. Fournier v. ClausonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API