Legal Opinion
Wright v. Foreman
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 5, 1927No. Docket No. 5975PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON (R. L.), J., pro tem.
This is an appeal from a verdict awarding respondent #1,500 damages for personal injuries sustained as a result of being struck by an automobile while walking across Eighth Street, in Los Angeles. Appellants claim that prejudicial error occurred in giving a certain instruction.
Respondent was employed as a saleswoman by the New York Cloak and Suit House at Seventh Street and Grand Avenue, in Los Angeles. At 5:15 o’clock P. M. August 9, 1922, she left her place of business, walking southerly along the easterly side of Grand Avenue until she reached the nearest curb…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gornstein v. PriverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Harris v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Moss v. H. R. Boynton Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
- Mayer v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
- Young Men's Christian Ass'n v. ParishWashington Supreme Court · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Fischer v. KeenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Stout v. LewisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
- Hoppe v. BradshawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Foerster v. DireitoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Long v. BarbieriCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.