Moore v. City & County of San Francisco
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DAVID, J. pro tem. *
Appellant Phoebe A. Moore sued respondents for false arrest and imprisonment. A jury verdict exculpated all defendants and Mrs. Moore appeals; the court granted plaintiff a limited judgment notwithstanding the verdict, and in the alternative, granted a new trial, and respondent City and County of San Francisco appeals.
In this case, the verdict of the jury (incorporated in the judgment) was:
“We, the jury, duly'empaneled, find as follows: . . .
“Al. We find (for) . . . defendant City and County of San Francisco on the issue of false imprisonment.
“A2. We find (for) . .…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Mercer v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Wilson M. Smith, Jr. v. United States of America, Raymond Bowden v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
- Sjoberg v. HastorfCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- People v. RobargeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Sullivan v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- City of Nome v. AilakAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
- Collins v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- People v. GilliamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Beavers v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.