Legal Opinion

Moore v. City & County of San Francisco

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 20, 1970No. Civ. 25516PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DAVID, J. pro tem. *

Appellant Phoebe A. Moore sued respondents for false arrest and imprisonment. A jury verdict exculpated all defendants and Mrs. Moore appeals; the court granted plaintiff a limited judgment notwithstanding the verdict, and in the alternative, granted a new trial, and respondent City and County of San Francisco appeals.

In this case, the verdict of the jury (incorporated in the judgment) was:

“We, the jury, duly'empaneled, find as follows: . . .
“Al. We find (for) . . . defendant City and County of San Francisco on the issue of false imprisonment.
“A2. We find (for) . .…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Mercer v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Wilson M. Smith, Jr. v. United States of America, Raymond Bowden v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
  4. Sjoberg v. HastorfCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. People v. RobargeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. City of Nome v. AilakAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Collins v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  4. People v. GilliamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  5. Beavers v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API