Legal Opinion

Kulike v. Fern

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1909PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Original.

1Opinion of the Court

*279OPINION OF THE COURT BY

HARTWELL, C. J. (Circuit Judge Be Bolt Dissenting.)

This is a petition by Tamos Kulike and thirty-five others, filed December 2, alleging that they are “duly qualified voters of the election districts of the County of Oahu,” signed and sworn to by all of them, their jurat setting’ forth that “the facts, statements and allegations in the petition were just and true to the host of their knowledge and belief except such matters therein set forth and alleged to be upon information and belief, and as to these matters, things, allegations and statements they verily believe…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ex parte MurphyNew York Supreme Court · 1827
  2. Brown v. IaukeaHawaii Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Cornwell v. KaiueHawaii Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Blake v. BakerHawaii Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Territory v. AlcantaraHawaii Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Funakoshi v. KingHawaii Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Akaka v. YoshinaHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Lane v. FernHawaii Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Allen v. SpencerHawaii Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API