Legal Opinion

Lane v. Fern

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1910PublishedCited by 1 opinion

ELECTION CONTEST.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

PERRY, J. (HARTWELL, C.J., DISSENTING IN PART.)

Briefly summarized, and subject to qualifications hereinafter mentioned, the petition sets up three causes of contest: (1) that in a named precinct the polls were kept open until 6:30 o’clock on the evening of election day and that sixty-four ballots were marked, cast and accepted after five o’clock p. m.; (2) that while a large number of voters were in the polling house engaged in marking their ballots, or about to do so, one McCandless was present and handed pencils to numerous electors and by words and acts endeavored to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. The People v. . CookNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
  2. Bowers v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1892
  3. Jones v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Varney v. JusticeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1888
  5. Attorney General ex rel. Reynolds v. MayMichigan Supreme Court · 1894

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. HAWAII STATE AFL-CIO v. YoshinaHawaii Supreme Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API