Legal Opinion
Wright v. Harrison & Black
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided December 15, 1916PublishedCited by 5 opinions
FROM RUTHERFORD. Appeal from 'the Chancery Court of Rutherford County. — WV S. BeaedeN, Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
Me. Special Justice
Clark delivered the opinion of the Court.
The hill in this case was filed for the purpose of having an alleged contract, with reference to the sale of real estate, declared forfeited and to recover a judgment for money paid by complainant to defendants on said contract.
It is charged in the hill that the defendants, T. H. Harrison and Joe M. Black, were-partners under the name and style of Harrison & Black, and that they were engaged in the sale of real estate; that they were the owners of a valuable tract of land near the city of Murfreesboro, Tenn., which tract of land they *159…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pulse v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Bamber v. SavageWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
- Graig v. GodfroyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1851
- Johnson v. KelloggTennessee Supreme Court · 1872
3Cited by5 opinions
- Texas Co. v. AycockTennessee Supreme Court · 1950
- Harris v. MorganTennessee Supreme Court · 1928
- Huffine v. McCampbellTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
- Black v. BlackTennessee Supreme Court · 1947
- Ulhorn v. L. Cohen Grocery Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1926