Legal Opinion

Pulse v. Miller

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1881No. 8830PublishedCited by 28 opinions

From the Shelby Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, C. J.

The complaint of the appellants is based upon the following contract: “Articles of agreement made and entered into by and between Hiram Pulse, George Pulse, Reuben Pulse, Peter Pulse and Florence Miller, of the first, part, and William Miller and Jasper Heck, of the second part,

“ The parties of the first part having this day conveyed certain lands situate in Liberty township, Shelby county, Indiana, in part, agree to have the same completed within twenty days, or pay the parties of the second part the sum of five hundred dollars, and the parties of the second part agree to comply with the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Williams v. MorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Wills v. RossIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Baldwin v. KerlinIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Board of Commissioners v. ShipleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Ridgway v. IngramIndiana Supreme Court · 1874

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Tewksbury v. HowardIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  2. High v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Zimmerman v. ZehendnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  4. New England Dressed Meat & Wool Co. v. Standard Worsted Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
  5. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. ReynoldsIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API