Legal Opinion

Huffine v. McCampbell

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1923PublishedCited by 25 opinions

FROM KNOX. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Knox. County to the Court of Civil Appeals, and by certiorari to the Court of Civil Appeals from the Supreme Court. — Hon. Chas. Hays Brown, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Malone, Special Judge,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

While several questions are discussed in the briefs of ■ counsel and in the opinion of the court of civil appeals, the determinative question here is whether a certain compromise agreement is enforceable under the statute of frauds,, and, more particularly, the effect of a deposition voluntarily given by a litigant, and its possible use as a memorandum to satisfy the fourth section of the statute of frauds.

*50This section of the statute of frauds, as embodied in Acts 1801, chapter 25, section 1 (Shannon’s Code, section 3142), contains…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ryan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Townsend v. HargravesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  3. Drury v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1882
  4. Argus Co. v. . Mayor, Etc., of AlbanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  5. Lee v. CherryTennessee Supreme Court · 1887

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Siddarth Shah and Daksha Shah, Plaintiffs-Appellants/cross-Appellees v. Racetrac Petroleum Co., Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  2. GRW Enterprises, Inc. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1990
  3. Texas Co. v. AycockTennessee Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Earline Waddle v. Lorene B. ElrodTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Cobble v. LangfordTennessee Supreme Court · 1950

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API