Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Kellogg

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 1872PublishedCited by 2 opinions

FROM MONTGOMERY. From the Chancery Court, October Term, 1868. J. O. Shackleford, Ch.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.

The original bill alleges that the defendant Kellogg purchased of one ¥m. Bradley a lot ■ of some two acres of land on the Cumberland River, in Montgomery county, known as the Bradley Sand Bank, that the purchase was made for the joint benefit of himself and one ¥m. E. Luter, but the bond for title was in the name of Kellogg alone, and Luter *263was not known in the purchase from Bradley, but that afterwards Luter paid Kellogg his part of" the first note, for the purchase money due to Bradley, which was $1,500, due in three installments, and therefore Kellogg executed and delivered to Luter a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Carland v. IrvinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1801
  2. Pendergrass v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1801

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Harriman Land Co. v. HiltonTennessee Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Wright v. Harrison & BlackTennessee Supreme Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API